A Clear and Comprehensive Guide to Conflicts of Interest in Investment Banking

Conflicts of interest are built into the structure of modern investment banking. Banks today trade securities, advise companies, manage client portfolios, and underwrite new share issuances—all under one roof. While these activities are essential to the functioning of capital markets, they create situations where the bank’s own interests may conflict with those of its clients. Understanding how these conflicts arise and how banks manage them is crucial for anyone who interacts with financial institutions.

Why Conflicts Naturally Occur in Investment Banking

Investment banks play several roles at once. They act as brokers for clients, they trade for their own profit, they manage portfolios, and they help companies raise money. Each of these roles comes with different goals. A trading desk wants to protect the bank’s capital. An asset-management team wants the best securities for its portfolios. An underwriting team wants to sell newly issued shares. A client wants fair treatment and transparent pricing.

Curious why commercial banking and investment banking are separate today? It’s a story of history, regulations, and trust. Learn more about how that balance was struck — and why it matters now, in this article - "Universal Banking".

When all these objectives intersect, the potential for conflict becomes inevitable. What matters is not that conflicts exist, but how well the bank controls them and protects its clients.

When Markets Fall: The Question of Client vs. Bank Priority

One of the clearest examples of conflict appears during a market crash. A bank might hold certain securities in its own trading book, while its clients hold the same securities in their portfolios. If markets start falling sharply, both the bank and its clients may try to sell at the same time.

In principle, the rule is simple: when the bank is acting as a broker, client orders must be treated first and handled fairly. The bank should seek the best possible execution for the client, and it is not allowed to delay or disadvantage client trades in order to protect its own positions.

However, real market stress creates pressure. Risk managers may instruct traders to reduce the bank’s own exposure immediately. Margin calls or liquidity needs might force rapid selling. This can create tension, because the bank must balance its own financial limits with its obligation to treat clients fairly.

Well-designed banks address this through strong trading rules, independent monitoring, and automated systems that ensure client orders cannot be manipulated or deprioritized. When done properly, clients receive fair execution even during extreme volatility.

Photo by author created with Gemini

Underwriting and Asset Management: A Conflict Hidden in Allocation Decisions

Another major conflict arises when banks underwrite new share issuances. Underwriting involves helping a company issue new stock and selling that stock to investors. At the same time, the bank’s asset-management business is often looking for attractive investment opportunities for its funds.

This creates a direct conflict: the bank controls which investors receive shares, and in what quantity. Popular or oversubscribed issuances are especially valuable. Because of this, the bank could be tempted to favor its own asset-management clients or investors that bring profitable business to the bank.

For example, the bank might place a large portion of an attractive IPO into its own managed funds rather than distributing those shares fairly across the market. While this may benefit the bank’s internal clients, it may disadvantage others who deserve a fair allocation.

To reduce such risks, many banks use allocation committees, documented criteria, and strict separation between underwriting teams and asset-management professionals. But even with controls, this is an area where regulators remain highly vigilant, because the bank’s influence over allocation carries significant power.

Why These Conflicts Matter for Markets and Clients

Conflicts of interest are not just internal issues—they directly affect investors, companies, and the fairness of markets. If banks do not manage these conflicts properly, several harmful outcomes can occur.

• Clients may receive poorer execution or smaller allocations.
• Market behavior may become distorted if certain investors receive preferential treatment.
• The misuse of internal information could violate regulations.
• Trust in the financial system could weaken.

When trust erodes, companies become hesitant to raise capital, investors feel disadvantaged, and the integrity of financial markets declines. This is why strong governance and transparent processes are essential.

How Banks Work to Manage and Reduce Conflict

Although conflicts cannot be eliminated, responsible banks put multiple controls in place to ensure fairness. They build information barriers to prevent sensitive data from flowing between teams. They restrict employees involved in deals from trading related securities. They use automated monitoring systems to detect unusual trading patterns. They require allocation decisions to be documented and reviewed.

These measures do not make conflicts disappear, but they create a framework in which the bank can operate transparently and ethically. Good governance, strong supervision, and a culture of integrity ensure that clients are protected and markets remain orderly.

The Role of Transparency in Maintaining Trust

In the end, managing conflicts successfully comes down to transparency and accountability. Banks that openly communicate their policies, disclose potential conflicts, and explain how they protect clients tend to maintain stronger relationships and better reputations. When rules are clear and consistently enforced, clients can trust that their interests are respected—even in a complex environment where multiple business lines operate simultaneously.

Conclusion

Conflicts of interest in investment banking are unavoidable, but they are not unmanageable. They arise because banks perform many interconnected roles, each with different incentives. Whether it is executing client trades during a market crash or allocating new shares in an issuance, the potential for tension is always present. What defines a trustworthy institution is how effectively it recognizes these conflicts, designs controls to limit them, and maintains transparent communication with clients.

By understanding these conflicts and the systems used to manage them, investors and companies can make more informed decisions and choose partners who prioritize fairness, accountability, and long-term trust.